Signed in as...
Juan Bravo
HomeMy ProfileMy AlertsSearchToolsHelpLog Out

New Articles

These are the latest Alerts we've found that meet your personalized settings.

  • No alerts showing?
    • You may not have selected a clinical discipline(s) yet; go to Personalized Alert Settings to do that.
    • If you have just updated your profile with a newly selected clinical discipline(s), you will begin to receive alerts as soon as we find articles that fit your interests. Meanwhile, please feel free to Search the database for articles of interest or review Featured Article.
    • You may have recently deleted your alerts and more will come according to the schedule you indicated when you registered.
  • If you would like to change the number or types of alerts, please change your personalized settings at Alert Setup.
  • All alerts are also in the EvidenceUpdates database; please find them by going to Search.


< Previous Back To New Articles Next >
Schurks M, Rist PM, Bigal ME, et al. Migraine and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009 Oct 27;339:b3914. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3914. (Review) PMID: 19861375
Read Abstract Read Comments Read Free Full Text
Clinical Evidence Topics: Acute myocardial infarctionMigraine headache
DISCIPLINERELEVANCE TO PRACTICEIS THIS NEWS?
Cardiology
General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
General Practice(GP)/Family Practice(FP)
Neurology

Save Article     Delete Article     Email this article to a colleague     Printer Friendly Version


Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between migraine and cardiovascular disease, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and reference lists of included studies and reviews published until January 2009. Selection criteria Case-control and cohort studies investigating the association between any migraine or specific migraine subtypes and cardiovascular disease. Review methods Two investigators independently assessed eligibility of identified studies in a two step approach. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Studies were grouped according to a priori categories on migraine and cardiovascular disease.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators extracted data. Pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: Studies were heterogeneous for participant characteristics and definition of cardiovascular disease. Nine studies investigated the association between any migraine and ischaemic stroke (pooled relative risk 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.29). Additional analyses indicated a significantly higher risk among people who had migraine with aura (2.16, 1.53 to 3.03) compared with people who had migraine without aura (1.23, 0.90 to 1.69; meta-regression for aura status P=0.02). Furthermore, results suggested a greater risk among women (2.08, 1.13 to 3.84) compared with men (1.37, 0.89 to 2.11). Age less than 45 years, smoking, and oral contraceptive use further increased the risk. Eight studies investigated the association between migraine and myocardial infarction (1.12, 0.95 to 1.32) and five between migraine and death due to cardiovascular disease (1.03, 0.79 to 1.34). Only one study investigated the association between women who had migraine with aura and myocardial infarction and death due to cardiovascular disease, showing a twofold increased risk.
CONCLUSION: Migraine is associated with a twofold increased risk of ischaemic stroke, which is only apparent among people who have migraine with aura. Our results also suggest a higher risk among women and risk was further magnified for people with migraine who were aged less than 45, smokers, and women who used oral contraceptives. We did not find an overall association between any migraine and myocardial infarction or death due to cardiovascular disease. Too few studies are available to reliably evaluate the impact of modifying factors, such as migraine aura, on these associations.

Comments from Clinical Raters
General Practice(GP)/Family Practice(FP)
Although a systematic review, it is based on observational studies that correct for confounding. Residual confounding could still have influence on the results.
BMJ Masterclasses
 

Quick Search: