What is KT+
Knowledge Translation+ (KT+)
is sponsored by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and is provided by the Health Information Research Unit at McMaster University.
How are the articles chosen for inclusion in KT+
KT+ provides access to the current evidence on knowledge translation
including articles on quality improvement, continuing medical education, computerized
clinical decision support, health services research and patient adherence. Its purpose
is to inform those working in the knowledge translation area of current research
as it is published
What are the criteria for exclusion of articles from KT
Research staff evaluate original and review articles in over
(including the Cochrane Library) and select articles that are relevant to knowledge
translation in the areas of quality improvement, continuing medical education,
computerized clinical decision support, health services research and patient adherence.
All citations are pre-rated for quality by research staff at McMaster University.
The articles are assessed on whether they meet
applicability in the clinical setting and then for the rigour of their methods.
The criteria are based on the purpose of the research.
Articles are identified in KT+
according to whether the study methods were sufficiently rigorous. Articles that fit one
or more purpose
categories and are methodologically sound are classed as ready for clinical attention
and are sent for rating by practicing clinicians. All articles are then rated for
clinical relevance and interest by at least 3 members of a worldwide panel of practicing
health professionals. (Quality-filtered KT Articles
indicated by blue
Articles are also identified from other sources (i.e., the included studies of KT systematic reviews).
These articles are not quality filtered for clinical readiness but have relevant KT content in the area of quality improvement,
continuing medical education, computerized clinical decision support, health services research and patient adherence.
These papers are not rated by the panel of health professionals (Non-filtered KT Articles
What are the features of KT+
- editorials, opinion pieces, letters
- case reports
- cost assessments
- basic research, animal studies, and studies with human materials not directly linked to individual human subjects.
of Quality-filtered KT Articles
(those that meet criteria for purpose and methodological rigour)
clinical relevance and newsworthiness
by at least 3 practitionerswith an interest in KT.
Email alerts about new Quality-filtered KT Articles
, adjusted to the users preset levels of relevance,
newsworthiness, and frequency. Each alert includes clinical ratings and comments, and electronic links to the articles abstract
on PubMed (if available) and to the full-text article on PubMed or the publishers
site (if available for free).
A cumulative, continuously updated searchable bibliographic database
for Quality-filtered KT Articles
and associated ratings and
Non-filtered KTArticles identified from other sources.
A link to EvidenceUpdates
a service from the BMJ Group and McMaster University's
Health Information Research Unit that provides access to current best evidence from research,
tailored to the users health care interests, to support evidence-based clinical decisions.
Links to related resources and tools
The information contained in KT
is intended for health professionals and is provided on an as is basis without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied.
KT+ provides an educational service for practicing clinicians and researchers and others
interested in current evidence on knowledge translation,
designed to alert them to important new research; however,
we cannot warrant its accuracy. The quality filtered KT articles are intended to support evidence-based
decision making by providing links to published research reports about quality improvement,
continuing medical education, computerized clinical decision support, health services
research and patient adherence. However, evidence does not make decisions2, and clinicians making decisions about the care of their patients must take into account
the limitations of evidence from research as well as the unique nature of their patients
circumstances and wishes. The research portion is intended to support research that will lead to
clinical advancements. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different
opinions about the interpretation of evidence from research. Because of this fact and also because
of regular advances in medical research, we strongly recommend that readers independently verify any
information they choose to rely on. Ultimately it is the readers responsibility to make their own
KT+ attempts to provide access to the best new KT research of relevance for clinical
practice and research. It does not report all research but uses explicit criteria to define a subset of published
research, first, that is likely to be valid and ready for clinical attention in these disciplines, and second, articles identified from other sources. For the quality filtered KT articles,
practitioners with an interest in KT then provide their assessments of the relevance and newsworthiness of
the reports through an online review process, the McMaster Online Rating of Evidence (MORE). Individual clinicians
who then receive these reviews must apply their own judgment concerning the strength and applicability of this
evidence to their own patients.
Description or reference to a product or publication does not imply endorsement of that product or publication.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Canadian Obesity Network/Rseau canadien en obsit and McMaster
University are not responsible for any losses, injury, or damage caused to any person or property (including
under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential, resulting from the application of the information on KT+
2Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice [editorial]. ACP Journal Club. 2002;136:A11-3.