Clinical performance of different SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody tests

J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):2243-2247. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26145. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological assays are urgently needed for rapid diagnosis, contact tracing, and for epidemiological studies. So far, there is limited data on how commercially available tests perform with real patient samples, and if positive tested samples show neutralizing abilities. Focusing on IgG antibodies, we demonstrate the performance of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays (Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Vircell COVID-19 ELISA IgG) in comparison to one lateral flow assay (FaStep COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device) and two in-house developed assays (immunofluorescence assay [IFA] and plaque reduction neutralization test [PRNT]). We tested follow up serum/plasma samples of individuals polymerase chain reaction-diagnosed with COVID-19. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 samples were from individuals with moderate to the severe clinical course, who required an in-patient hospital stay. For all examined assays, the sensitivity ranged from 58.8 to 76.5% for the early phase of infection (days 5-9) and from 93.8% to 100% for the later period (days 10-18).

Keywords: ELISA; IFA; IgG; PRNT; SARS-CoV-2; antibody tests.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antibodies, Viral / blood*
  • COVID-19 / blood
  • COVID-19 / diagnosis*
  • COVID-19 / immunology
  • COVID-19 / virology
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / standards
  • Female
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect / standards
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neutralization Tests / standards
  • SARS-CoV-2 / immunology*
  • SARS-CoV-2 / pathogenicity
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Immunoglobulin G