Decision-analysis modeling of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for surgical inpatients using variable risk assessment models or other strategies

J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jun;21(6):1580-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Abstract

Background: Surgical inpatients are at a risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which can be life-threatening or result in chronic complications. Thromboprophylaxis reduces the VTE risk but incurs costs and may increase bleeding risk. Risk assessment models (RAMs) are currently used to target thromboprophylaxis at high-risk patients.

Objectives: To determine the balance of cost, risk, and benefit for different thromboprophylaxis strategies in adult surgical inpatients, excluding patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery or were under critical care and pregnant women.

Methods: Decision analytic modeling was performed to estimate the following outcomes for alternative thromboprophylaxis strategies: thromboprophylaxis usage; VTE incidence and treatment; major bleeding; chronic thromboembolic complications; and overall survival. Strategies compared were as follows: no thromboprophylaxis; thromboprophylaxis for all; and thromboprophylaxis given according to RAMs (Caprini and Pannucci). Thromboprophylaxis is assumed to be given for the duration of hospitalization. The model evaluates lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) within England's health and social care services.

Results: Thromboprophylaxis for all surgical inpatients had a 70% probability of being the most cost-effective strategy (at a £20 000 per QALY threshold). RAM-based prophylaxis would be the most cost-effective strategy if a RAM with a higher sensitivity (99.9%) were available for surgical inpatients. QALY gains were mainly due to reduced postthrombotic complications. The optimal strategy was sensitive to several other factors such as the risk of VTE, bleeding and postthrombotic syndrome, duration of prophylaxis, and patient age.

Conclusion: Thromboprophylaxis for all eligible surgical inpatients seemed to be the most cost-effective strategy. Default recommendations for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, with the potential to opt-out, may be superior to a complex risk-based opt-in approach.

Keywords: anticoagulants; cost-benefit analysis; operative; risk assessment; surgical procedures; venous thromboembolism.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Inpatients
  • Pregnancy
  • Risk Assessment
  • Venous Thromboembolism* / epidemiology

Substances

  • Anticoagulants