Tsou PY, Kurbedin J, Chen YS, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care focused echocardiography in predicting outcome of resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017 Mar 2;114:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.021.
Discipline Area Score
Physician 6 / 7

OBJECTIVE: We aim to summarize current evidence on the value of point-of-care (POC) focused echocardiography in the assessment of short-term survival in patients with cardiac arrest.

METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2016 for eligible studies that evaluated the utility of POC echocardiography in patients with cardiac arrest. Modified QUADAS was used to appraise the quality of included studies. A random-effect bivariate model and a hierarchical summary receiving operating curve were used to summarize the performance characteristics of focused echocardiography.

RESULTS: Initial search identified 961 citations of which 15 were included in our final analysis. A total of 1695 patients had POC echocardiography performed during resuscitation. Ultrasonography was mainly utilized to detect spontaneous cardiac movement (SCM) and identify reversible causes of cardiac arrest. Subcostal, apical and parasternal views were used to identify cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, and pleural view for tension pneumothorax. Results of meta-analysis showed that SCM detected by focused echocardiography had a pooled sensitivity (0.95, 95%CI: 0.72-0.99) and specificity (0.80, 95%CI: 0.63-0.91) in predicting return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during cardiac arrest, with a positive likelihood ratio of 4.8 (95% CI: 2.5-9.4) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI: 0.01-0.39).

CONCLUSION: POC focused echocardiography can be used to identify reversible causes and predict short-term outcome in patients with cardiac arrest. In patients with a low pretest probability for ROSC, absence of SCM on echocardiography can predict a low likelihood of survival and guide the decision of resuscitation termination.

Comments from MORE raters

Physician rater

The review itself is not focused nor new (diagnosis of tamponade ...), too unspecific vague ("spontaneous cardiac movement", LR), and based on methodologically studies to weak to meaningfully guide peri-CPR decisions.

Physician rater

The review has value for determining the utility of resuscitation and may be useful for emergency responders.

Physician rater

Assuming the technology is available and the operator is credible, point-of-care echo can identify presence or absence of spontaneous cardiac activity, and these can be used to identify those more likely to survive vs those that are not.
Comments from RESUSCITATION+ subscribers

No subscriber has commented on this article yet.