Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 22;18(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04482-1.

Abstract

Background: While ultrasound (US) measures of the subacromial space (SAS) have demonstrated excellent reliability, measurements are typically captured by experts with extensive ultrasound experience. Further, the agreement between US measured SAS width and other imaging modalities has not been explored. This research evaluated the agreement between SAS measures captured by novice and expert raters and between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study also evaluated the effect of US transducer tilt on measured SAS.

Methods: Nine men and nine women participated in this study. US images were captured by a novice and expert with the participant in both seated and supine positions. An inclinometer was fixed to the US probe to measure transducer tilt. SAS width was measured in real time from freeze framed images. MRI images were captured, and the humerus and acromion manually segmented. The SAS width was measured using a custom algorithm.

Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between novice and expert raters were 0.74 and 0.63 for seated and supine positions, respectively. Intra-rater agreement was high for both novice (ICC = 0.83-0.84) and expert (ICC ≥ 0.94) raters. Agreement between US and MRI was poor (ICC = 0.21-0.49) but linearly related.

Conclusions: Moderate agreement between novice and expert raters was demonstrated, while the agreement between US and MRI was poor. High intra-rater reliability within each rater suggests that US measures of the SAS may be completed by a novice with introductory training.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Reliability; Shoulder; Ultrasound.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sitting Position
  • Ultrasonography / methods