High magnitude loading from performing resistance-based exercise has been found to improve tendon strength and reduce symptoms of Achilles tendinopathy (AT) but is difficult to quantify without specialist equipment. Here, we assess the validity and reliability of a novel AT rehabilitation tool (the "PhysViz" system) compared to a "gold-standard" dynamometer for assessing plantarflexion maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC). 41 participants aged 18-60 completed the study. A within-subject test-retest study design was used to examine and compare the validity and reliability of the two systems during plantarflexion MVICs. Test - retest reliability of the two methods were determined by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals. Method agreement was assessed with Bland - Altman Limits of Agreement (LoA) analysis. The PhysViz demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability; ICC, SEM and MDC were numerically comparable to the dynamometer (ICC 0.93 vs. 0.92; SEM 2.01 vs. 2.95 kg and MDC 5.58 vs. 8.18 kg, respectively), indicating that the novel system is valid and reliable for measuring plantarflexor MVICs. Future studies should address its utility in monitoring AT rehabilitative loading remotely over time.
Keywords: ICC; Reliability; dynamometer; limits of agreement; plantarflexion; telehealth.