Effect of Robotic-Assisted Gait at Different Levels of Guidance and Body Weight Support on Lower Limb Joint Kinematics and Coordination

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 29;23(21):8800. doi: 10.3390/s23218800.

Abstract

The Lokomat provides task-oriented therapy for patients with gait disorders. This robotic technology drives the lower limbs in the sagittal plane. However, normative gait also involves motions in the coronal and transverse planes. This study aimed to compare the Lokomat with Treadmill gait through three-dimensional (3D)-joint kinematics and inter-joint coordination. Lower limb kinematics was recorded in 18 healthy participants who walked at 3 km/h on a Treadmill or in a Lokomat with nine combinations of Guidance (30%, 50%, 70%) and bodyweight support (30%, 50%, 70%). Compared to the Treadmill, the Lokomat altered pelvic rotation, decreased pelvis obliquity and hip adduction, and increased ankle rotation. Moreover, the Lokomat resulted in significantly slower velocity at the hip, knee, and ankle flexion compared to the treadmill condition. Moderate to strong correlations were observed between the Treadmill and Lokomat conditions in terms of inter-joint coordination between hip-knee (r = 0.67-0.91), hip-ankle (r = 0.66-0.85), and knee-ankle (r = 0.90-0.95). This study showed that some gait determinants, such as pelvis obliquity, rotation, and hip adduction, are altered when walking with Lokomat in comparison to a Treadmill. Kinematic deviations induced by the Lokomat were most prominent at high levels of bodyweight support. Interestingly, different levels of Guidance did not affect gait kinematics. The present results can help therapists to adequately select settings during Lokomat therapy.

Keywords: Lokomat; angular velocity; body weight support; continuous relative phase; gait pattern; robotic assistance; statistical parametric mapping; treadmill.

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Body Weight
  • Gait
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint
  • Lower Extremity
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures*
  • Walking

Grants and funding

The authors acknowledge the FRQS (310877), GRSTB (1547), and the Méditis (NSERC, 455628) program that funded this research.