En Français | Return |
Women who continued or started hormone therapy after being diagnosed with a DVT or PE were not more likely to develop a new DVT or PE than women who were not taking hormone therapy.
It is important to note that once anticoagulant therapy is stopped, continuing or starting hormone therapy will increase the risk of clotting in the future.
Understanding the problem
Taking hormones in the form of the oral contraceptive pill (birth control pill) or as hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. When a woman is diagnosed with a DVT or PE, she is commonly told by her doctor or pharmacist that she should stop taking hormones immediately. This causes problems because women take hormones for important reasons, including to control heavy periods, prevent pregnancy, and control severe symptoms due to menopause.
Because anticoagulants stop blood from clotting, taking an anticoagulant would be expected to cancel out the increased risk of clotting caused by hormones. This should mean that a woman with a blood clot who is taking hormones can continue to take them safely as long as she is also taking anticoagulants at the same time.
Researchers looked at the results of a recent clinical trial to see if women who continued to take hormones or started taking hormones after they were diagnosed with a DVT or PE had a higher risk of developing a new blood clot than women who were not taking hormones.
Who? The study included 1888 women who were treated for a new DVT or PE with enoxaparin (injection) plus a vitamin K antagonist (e.g., warfarin) or Xarelto®.
What? The study compared the risk of developing a new DVT or PE in women who were taking hormone therapy or started hormone therapy versus those who were not taking hormone therapy.
Hormone therapy plus anticoagulants | vs | Anticoagulants alone |
---|---|---|
Hormone therapy included estrogen-only pills, combined estrogen–progesterone contraceptives, and progestin-only contraceptives (including pills, implants, injectables, and intrauterine devices). | No hormone therapy |
Hormone therapy vs no hormone therapy in women who are taking anticoagulants for DVT or PE
Outcomes at 3 to 12 months | Rate of events with hormone therapy | Rate of events without hormone therapy | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Recurrent DVT or PE | 4 out of 100 women per year | 5 out of 100 women per year | No difference* |
*Although the rates for the 2 groups look different, the differences were not statistically significant—this means that the difference could simply be due to chance rather than due to the different treatments.
This Evidence Summary is based on the following article:
Martinelli I, Lensing AW, Middeldorp S, et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and abnormal uterine bleeding with anticoagulant and hormone therapy use. Blood. 2016 Mar 17;127(11):1417-25. PubMed
Lori-Ann Linkins, MD, MSc (Clin Epi), FRCPC
Dr. Linkins is an Associate Professor of Medicine (thrombosis) at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada. She holds a Masters Degree in Health Research Methodology and is a Deputy Editor with the Health Information Research Unit, McMaster. She is Co-Editor of the ACP Journal Club and Co-lead on the CanVECTOR Knowledge Translation Platform.
Published: Thursday, May 10, 2018
Last Updated: Thursday, July 30, 2020
Please note that the information contained herein is not to be interpreted as an alternative to medical advice from a professional healthcare provider. If you have any questions about any medical matter, you should consult your professional healthcare providers, and should never delay seeking medical advice, disregard medical advice or discontinue medication based on information provided here.
This Evidence Summary was printed from the CLOT+ website on 2024/12/31. To view other Evidence Summaries or to register to receive email notifications about new Evidence Summaries, please visit us at https://plus.mcmaster.ca/ClotPlus/Articles/EvidenceSummaries |